HOW TO INTERPRET THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS?
Yves Haeck
Constitutional Law Review, Volume 3, Issue 4, 2011, pages 3-30
DIFFERENT STANDARDS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW. THE NATURE AND OBJECT OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Françoise Tulkens
Constitutional Law Review, Volume 3, Issue 4, 2011, pages 31-39
JUDICIAL ACTIVISM AND THE INFLUENCE OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS ON THE GEORGIAN JUDICIAL PRACTICE
Konstantin Korkelia
Constitutional Law Review, Volume 3, Issue 4, 2011, pages 40-47
THE GEORGIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT’S POWER IN THE PROTECTION OF FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS
John Khetsuriani
Constitutional Law Review, Volume 3, Issue 4, 2011, pages 48-61
INTERNATIONAL-LEGAL STANDARDS FOR APPLICATION OF PROCEDURAL COERCIVE MEASURES RESTRICTING FREEDOM
Lali Papiashvili
Constitutional Law Review, Volume 3, Issue 4, 2011, pages 62-96
IMPORTANCE OF DISSENTING AND CONCURRING OPINIONS (SEPARATE OPINIONS) IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL AND JUDICIAL REVIEW WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO SLOVENIAN PRACTICE
Arne Marjan Mavčič
Constitutional Law Review, Volume 3, Issue 4, 2011, pages 99-108
THE IMPORTANCE OF DISSENTING AND CONCURRING OPINIONS FOR THE ROMANIAN CONSTITUTIONAL JUSTICE
Tudorel Toader
Constitutional Law Review, Volume 3, Issue 4, 2011, pages 109-115
DISSENTING AND CONCURRING OPINIONS IN THE PRACTICE OF THE BULGARIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT
Dimitry Tokushev
Constitutional Law Review, Volume 3, Issue 4, 2011, pages 116-119
THE DISSENTING OPINION OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT JUDGES – ONE OF THE GUARANTORS OF THE COURT’S INDEPENDENCE
Elena Safaleru
Constitutional Law Review, Volume 3, Issue 4, 2011, pages 120-124
THE ROLE OF DISSENTING AND CONCURRING OPINIONS IN THE TURKISH PRACTICE
Alpaslan Altan
Constitutional Law Review, Volume 3, Issue 4, 2011, pages 125-130
FORMATION OF THE INSTITUTE OF SPECIAL OPINION IN THE PRACTICE OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE AZERBAIJAN REPUBLIC
Jeyhun Garajayev
Constitutional Law Review, Volume 3, Issue 4, 2011, pages 131-134
