No. 4 (2011)

Articles

• HOW TO INTERPRET THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS?

  Yves Haeck (Author)

  3-31

  • PDF (Georgian)
  • PDF

• DIFFERENT STANDARDS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW. THE NATURE AND OBJECT OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

  Françoise Tulkens (Author)

  32-41

  • PDF (Georgian)
  • PDF

• JUDICIAL ACTIVISM AND THE INFLUENCE OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS ON THE GEORGIAN JUDICIAL PRACTICE

  Konstantin Korkelia (Author)

  42-50

  • PDF
  • PDF (Georgian)

• THE GEORGIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT’S POWER IN THE PROTECTION OF FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS

  John Khetsuriani (Author)

  51-66

  • PDF
  • PDF (Georgian)

• INTERNATIONAL-LEGAL STANDARDS FOR APPLICATION OF PROCEDURAL COERCIVE MEASURES RESTRICTING FREEDOM

  Lali Papiashvili (Author)

  67-104

  • PDF
  • PDF (Georgian)

• IMPORTANCE OF DISSENTING AND CONCURRING OPINIONS (SEPARATE OPINIONS) IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL AND JUDICIAL REVIEW WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO SLOVENIAN PRACTICE

  Prof. Dr. Arne Marjan Mavčič (Author)

  107-118

  • PDF (Georgian)
  • PDF

• THE IMPORTANCE OF DISSENTING AND CONCURRING OPINIONS FOR THE ROMANIAN CONSTITUTIONAL JUSTICE

  Professor Tudorel TOADER, PhD (Author)

  119-126

  • PDF
  • PDF (Georgian)

• DISSENTING AND CONCURRING OPINIONS IN THE PRACTICE OF THE BULGARIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT

  Professor Dimitry Tokushev (Author)

  127-131

  • PDF (Georgian)
  • PDF

• THE DISSENTING OPINION OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT JUDGES – ONE OF THE GUARANTORS OF THE COURT’S INDEPENDENCE

  Elena Safaleru (Author)

  132-136

  • PDF
  • PDF (Georgian)

• THE ROLE OF DISSENTING AND CONCURRING OPINIONS IN THE TURKISH PRACTICE1

  Dr. Alpaslan Altan (Author)

  137-143

  • PDF (Georgian)
  • PDF

• FORMATION OF THE INSTITUTE OF SPECIAL OPINION IN THE PRACTICE OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE AZERBAIJAN REPUBLIC

  Jeyhun Garajayev (Author)

  144-148

  • PDF
  • PDF (Georgian)